The River Euphrates

Stuck here out of gas... out here on the gaza Strip

Tuesday, October 20, 2009

Holy Shit

Wow.

Long time no blog (I've got a life).

What to say?

Shit has changed considerably - while staying mostly the same.

Barrack Obama won the election - and has been rocking out ever since.

Idiot republican douchebags continue to label everything he does 'socialist', and have managed to marginalize themselves almost completely.

Maybe sometime I'll have more time to elaborate on current events - economy sucks, massive layoffs - and yet here I am.

Rocking out.

Saturday, May 05, 2007

Long Time No Blog

It's not that I'm so smart, it's just that I stay with problems longer.

-Albert Einstein

Sorry for the year long break (if anyone else besides me is actually reading this).

I got busy, work was crazy, etc. - but I'm back in action now.

It's been a wild year for the whole world - Dubya continues to ignore reality, Dems took back control of everything except the White House (coming in '08) and the Supreme Court (fully stacked).

The surge is a pathetic attempt to put a bandaid on a severed artery. Either we need sufficient troops to stabilize the region (if that is even possible), or we need to get the fuck out - now. If this is really the battle for the future of western civilization as these dickheads would have you believe, then they have been abject failures at every step of the way - almost seemingly by choice.

I don't really have a favorite in the '08 Presidential elections yet. Wes Clark I have liked for a while, Joe Biden is decent, I wouldn't mind Obama - though I have serious doubts that this cracker-ass nation is ready for a black president. He would have to spend twice as much on security as any previous president (someone killed kennedy - I can gaurantee some redneck racist asshole (if not dozens of them) would probably give it a shot. Hillary can go fuck herself. I've never been able to really stand her, and I was never really a Bill Clinton fan myself (though after six - seven years of the Dub-meister - either one of them would be fucking awesome right about now though I would still have trouble pushing Hillary's button in the voting booth.

Speaking of which - there better not be any more of this Diebold bullshit. I demand a certifiable vote record with ZERO chance for fucking with it. Anyone who doesn't is a complete and utter dumbass - regardless of your party affiliation (or hopeful lack thereof) you should want to see results that can be recounted, crosschecked, and verified as many times and by whoever the fuck might want to do it. Anyone still using Diebolds equipment should be rounded up and fucking shot. Those people have proven themselves unworthy of the responsibility of providing equipment for the American people to perform such an important task as voting for their leaders. They should have to buy every single machine back - anyone who recommended these machines, or profited in any way from the sales of these machines should be put into a fucking cell.

Until next time - I'll have a bunch more catching up to do...

For now - just remember - this Iraq shit is about to have to come to a screeching halt. It is up to the American people to not only come up with a viable exit strategy that isn't 'cutting and running' but something that has an actual chance of leaving the Iraqi people in control of their own country, and not just a bunch of radical Islamist psychopaths. I want to see every single Bush administration official including Dubya himself, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfield, Condoleeza Rice, and those PNAC cocksuckers like Paul Wolfowitz, Bill Kristol, and the rest of them have all of their records, e-mails, and shit subpoena'd, and get them all lined up in front of a little 'inquiry' panel. It's time for them to answer some questions - and the second they start in on their rhetoric, slap them down like the pieces of shit they are.

Peace.

Monday, May 08, 2006

Get Up, Stand Up

You measure democracy by the freedom it gives its dissidents, not the freedom it gives its assimilated conformists."

-Abbie Hoffman


With incompetent wars continuing worldwide, debt stacked to the ceiling, and rampant corruption in government, it is truly a sad time for America. I keep telling myself that it will all work out, and there does seem to be light at the end of this tunnel--since this is an election year, and so far the chances of wresting at least one branch of the government out of GOP control look good, though taking both would be better. I don't know if the Democrats have the combination of balls and determination it is going to take to regain power, and get to work fixing the result of six years of rampant ignorance, cronyism, and blatant misuse of power. There needs to be a shake up in government--on both sides of the aisle.

With all of the problems that the U.S. faces right now, I would have to say the number one problem is the apathy of the majority of American citizens. The hypnotized masses repeat only what their television fills their weak minds with. People are concerned more with celebrity trash, garbage television shows, and their pathetic little lives than with the screws that tighten every passing day that we allow those in power to lie, cheat, steal, and break the very laws that are supposed to keep this kind of one-party government from occuring.

The psychology of the GOP has always been based on fear and paranoia. They sow the seeds of distrust, and soon everyone is keeping an eye on their neighbors, family, and friends. Even when they notice that something doesn't seem right, they keep their mouths shut out of fear that 'someone is listening or watching'. They have struck right at the heart of one of the things that has always made America a great place--our freedom (and responsibility) to speak out against the kinds of aggresive actions taken, and obvious untruths that this administration continues to spew. This generates a lot of silence on the part of those who might otherwise speak out, but cannot, or will not, due to their fear of being labeled 'unpatriotic'. The definition of patriotism (at least in the GOP supporters eyes) has changed from being someone who puts their country and it's people over any kind of politics, to someone who is self-serving, and most importantly unquestioning.

As Adlai E. Stevenson once said: "Patriotism is not short, frenzied outbursts of emotion, but the tranquil and steady dedication of a lifetime."

Those who are overly concerned with the way that others perceive them tend to wear their patriotism on their sleeve. The same goes for religion. I have always said that I have no problem with other people's free expression of their beliefs and opinions (as long as they are noted as such, and no effort is made to pass them off as anything other than what they are). Unfortunately, having beliefs and opinions (and the right to express them) doesn't seem to be enough for these people. They seem to require everyone around them to know exactly how pious/patriotic/selfless they are, and they are willing to go to great lengths to make sure that noone doubts it.

These are usually the same people who spent their school years trying so hard to fit in to whatever clique or group that they perceived as being the 'coolest'. They would make decisions from who (and more importantly who not) to hang out with, fashion and grooming, to music and entertainment, social events, and pretty much their entire fragile little world based on the stringent, and ever changing whims of the 'elite'. Their worship of 'elites' plagued them into college, where they joined fraternities and sororities. They were willing to undergo humiliating, and sometimes painful hazing rituals, just so that they could be seen as part of the 'in' crowd on campus. After graduation (or the alternative) they go out into the real world, and while some are able to find positions that make the most of their conformity, most are thoroughly confused when they find themselves without the kind of social structure that they clung to while in school.
Keep in mind that the majority of these people were also raised from before the time they were able to comprehend what they were being told to believe in God, and were forced to worship him as the Supreme Ruler of the Elite, 'The Saved'. To fear this God because he can send you to hell. It is probably impossible to completely eliminate the damage done to a young mind by fundamentalist 'christians' that preach fear, hate, and delusions. Through subtle mind games even seemingly benign religions can latch onto a young childs mind, and not allow them to think freely or ever truly be happy throughout their entire lives.

The alternative that some of these elite worshippers take is to join the military (until another draft, at which point they will no longer have a choice). The military has long had the reputation of whipping young people (well, mostly boys) into shape (and then sending them off to die). The same kind of elite worship bred in children through religions and social structures is again put to work, indeed - religion is intertwined with the military, and the command structure is very simliar to large religions such as catholicism. Each level in the chain of command requires subservience and respect from the lower ranks. Individualism in any form is frowned upon, which of course is required in order to transform a group of kids into a coordinated, lethal, and most importantly unquestioning killing force. There are extremely severe punishments for disobeying or even questioning orders, and any kind of dissonance is immediately dealt with.

After WWII, nazis were infamously quoted as justifying their abominable actions with the pathetic excuse 'I was only following orders'. While of course, they could have chosen not to follow orders (and face being thrown into the camps along with everyone else), the choice was still theirs, regardless of what kind of propaganda they had been fed. It is exactly the same now, when a soldier or an officer stays silent after witnessing detainee abuse, or the obvious negative effect that the US presence in Iraq continues to have regarding stabilization and security in the region. Of course, the military requires this kind of system, where the highest echelons make the decisions, and don' t have to worry about being questioned by everyone below them--right down to the guy on the ground being shot at. This system breaks down, however, when the guy on the ground realizes that those making the decisions, don't have a clue what the fuck is going on.

Outside of the military there are other places that weak minded elite followers can find a similar niche. One of these is in the business world as a corporate whore. A corporate whore is anyone who is willing to put their corporation (and the accompanying slogans) above anything else in their lives. Any relationships these people have outside of work are usually shallow, and most likely have some kind of ulterior motive involving their future with the corporation. Within this world, there is almost nothing that is below them when it comes to sucking up to their boss, the CEO, or whoever they are dealing with. Corporations thrive off of having a large supply of suck-ups that will stop at nothing to beat their competition (co-workers) to make it to the top of the heap. The corporate whore can be extremely successful in business, and might even have a modicum of happiness--though most tend to hit bottom at some point, with the stress and competition forcing them to turn to drink or drugs to ease the pain of the realization that their life is meaningless, just another cog to keep the cash flowing into someone elses pocket. The truly sad corporate whores are the low level type. These are mostly the ones who are put in positions where they manage groups of people and are given the delusion that they may one day work their way up the ladder. Their delusions are glaringly obvious when they communicate with their employees using company slogans, motivational speeches, and all varieties of lame attempts at rallying everyone together to get a job done. The resemblance to the military is uncanny, with exactly the same kind of social structure, and the same problem regarding the obliviousness of the higher-ups.

With all of this conformity, and people's willingness to accept what they are told, and to never consider questioning it, the individual must be incredibly brave when it comes to fighting the system. Most people are too embarrased to speak out at the risk of being ridiculed. Even if they can find something that they believe in strongly, it is easy for them to make mistakes--overzealous individuals often fall directly into the traps set by those who work to keep free thought and logical reasoning out of our government, out of our military, and out of our workplaces. There are mountains of false or innacurate information in the news and on the internet. Some is the work of people who actually believe in what they are writing about, but a growing percentage of the nuttiest sounding theories and information are being planted by those wishing to discredit legitimate questions regarding the illegal activities of this administration and it's complete lack of regard for the American people who they work for.

The problem for a lot of individuals seems to be that they can't envision an alternative. They can see plainly that Dubya & co. need to get the boot, but they are concerned that the Democrats do not provide a sound alternative. Third parties in the last few elections have mostly only managed to take votes away from Democrats, ensuring GOP majorities (and then there's Diebold--but that's a whole other subject). The important task at hand right now is to get as many people as possible informed about what is actually going on in Washington DC right now. This administrations failed policies, illegal activity, and blatant war profiteering need to be pointed out whenever anyone from this administration speaks in public. They have shown repeatedly how fast one of their press conferences can go downhill as soon as someone starts to ask the hard questions. They will not admit their shortcomings however, and instead have all taken the 'non-answer' approach where they answer a question, but not the question being asked. The speeches that they give continue to have that same hollow ring, as they preach to the converted, and carefully screen out anyone who might want to point out that the emperor is butt-nekkid.

Next Time: Possessions, Greed, and Happiness

Friday, April 07, 2006

The Origin of God

Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able? Then he is not omnipotent. Is he able, but not willing? Then he is malevolent. Is he both able and willing? Then whence cometh evil? Is he neither able nor willing? Then why call him God?

— Epicurus (341–270 B.C.), Greek philosopher


Is there such a being as God? If so, what is the nature of Him/Her/It? Is God mysterious and hidden from view or overt and in plain sight? Is God wrathful or gentle? Does God rain down righteous judgement on a sinful mankind? Or is God simply the invention of overactive human imagination, which has a tendency to impart human qualities to inanimate objects, animals, and their surroundings?

For this discussion, I will attempt to seperate the concept of God from the concept of religion. Different religions have different Gods, some with elaborate hierarchies of divine beings, and differing amounts of interaction between the divine and humans. The majority of the information regarding these 'supreme beings' is located in the writings of these religions, but the concept of 'God' reaches further back, and predates most of the mythology and mysticism that pervades most religions. Pre-historic man probably could not help but see the sun and feel some kind of awe. After all, it gave light, warmth, and caused the plants to grow. Even now, with all of the science and greater understanding we have of the nature of the sun, it still holds the same importance in our lives. Most early religions worshipped things in nature, or at least held them in high regard.

The question then becomes- 'Is God the creator of all things, or embodied in all things? Or both? Or neither?'. Noone can truly verify the existence or nature of God. All we can do is observe and attempt to seperate what is real, from what we have been taught. Most people have preconceived notions of what God is, and what (if any) expectations they believe that God has. It is nearly impossible for someone to grow up in any culture and not absorb some of the beliefs of that culture, even if they do not necessarily believe in any of it themselves. Some are happy and content to accept what they are taught, and to not question it. Others boldly defy what is taught, and work to expose the inconsistencies and overt hypocrisy embodied within those beliefs. Some are able to piece together something that is probably more accurate by educating themselves, questioning, and reasoning, but unfortunately these are rare, as the vast majority prefer acceptance and passivity.

There are many stories of peoples personal acceptance of God. Most revolve around people who grew up being fed their parents notions of the nature of God, and after they 'went astray' were put back on the path, and now they've been 'saved'. The delusions that are injected into children when they are young will stay rooted in their subconcious after they grow up, and won't ever allow the adult to make clear decisions, or question the validity of their beliefs. These beliefs are reinforced by others who have had the same conditioning, and the cycle continues on and on. As I repeatedly implore people to do, never accept something just because it makes you feel better.

The individuals life must be a continuous search for truth. It is necessary to take caution when dismissing things as untrue, or accepting things as true. Always take into account that everyone has biases and preconceptions, try to determine what yours are, and make sure that you are aware of how they color your perception. Remember how myths and rumors propagate, and how to spot and avoid them. Exercise reason and logic in all things, and above all, never stop questioning.

The fool may say in his heart that there is no God, but the real fool is the one who never questions it.

Next Time: Get Up, Stand Up

Wednesday, March 15, 2006

Freedom Of The Press

In the First Amendment, the Founding Fathers gave the free press the protection it must have to fulfill its essential role in our democracy. The press was to serve the governed, not the governors. The Government's power to censor the press was abolished so that the press would remain forever free to censure the Government. The press was protected so that it could bare the secrets of government and inform the people. Only a free and unrestrained press can effectively expose deception in government. And paramount among the responsibilities of a free press is the duty to prevent any part of the government from deceiving the people and sending them off to distant lands to die of foreign fevers and foreign shot and shell.

--Justice Black. NYT v. US. 403 US 713


Over the last few years, but more vocally in the last few weeks, the Bush administration has been working to eliminate one of the most important aspects of what makes America a free country. Instead of admitting obvious shortcomings in their pre-war planning, as well as blatant attempts to obscure the truth regarding the existance of weapons of mass destruction, they have decided to blame their failures on the negative press that has been the unavoidable result.

They would like us to believe that if only more people supported their illegal and immoral war, and if the media were to switch from printing news regarding continued Iraqi and US troop deaths, continuing violence and chaos, an emerging civil war, and the fact that there is no end in sight, that we would suddenly start winning. This is what someone recently dubbed the 'tinkerbell approach' where if only we believed hard enough, we could magically change reality.

At the same time as more and more media outlets are being consolidated, and run by large corporations that only allow those outlets to report what they want to hear, lies regarding the existance of a 'liberal media' are repeated over and over. There may be some liberal media outlets, however labeling one 'ultra-liberal' simply because they report the truth regarding the illegal activities of the president of the United States is the result of right-wing spin, and nothing more. Former republican president Theodore Roosevelt, once said "To announce that there must be NO criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President Right or Wrong, is not only UNPATRIOTIC and SERVILE, but is Morally TREASONABLE to the American Public." (did I mention that Teddy was a republican? It kind of shows you how far these neo-conservatives have grown apart from their republican roots).

What has changed since then? Dubya & Co. would have you believe that things have changed in the 'post 9/11 world' as they like to call it. I call that exactly what it is--BULLSHIT!
This constant state of war that they have attempted to create, in order to advance the unilateral powers of their puppet president is more of the same, as are their attempts to pretend as if they care about the rights and freedom of American citizens. If allowed to continue, they will most likely pass legislation making it crime to point out that the president is breaking the law. Whistleblowers that have responsible for heroic acts of exposing illegal activity within government are now being turned into criminals, as are the journalists who dare to report the information that is given to them.

This administration has heaped blame on the media, liberals, democrats, anti-war protestors, peace activists, and anyone else that dares to question it's motives and actions. They refuse to accept responsibility for their failures, and instead revert to the same tactics used by dictators and imperialists throughout history. They attack the patriotism of anyone who stands up to them, claiming that they are 'giving comfort to the enemy'. The fact that they don't seem to realize how much this sounds like pre-WWII Nazi propaganda, and that Americans fail to take them to task for it, is just more evidence that entirely too many people are more than willing to ignore history, and are definitely doomed to repeat it.

Next time: The Origin of God

Thursday, March 09, 2006

The Global Economy and Corporate Greed

"There is only one thing in this world, and that is to keep acquiring money and more money, power and more power. All the rest is meaningless."

--Napoleon Bonaparte


There has been a massive shift over the last half century towards a global economy. Corporations in wealthy countries have many reasons for moving towards this kind of system. It is much easier to hide money, decrease or duck taxes, and bypass laws regarding wages and working conditions. Under the guise of 'free trade' these corporations have been guilty of outsourcing jobs that are the mainstay of individuals within their countries, and instead getting their labor from underdeveloped countries. They will pretend on the surface to be helping out the less fortunate countries, but instead set up 'sweat shops' and combine forced labor--often including children, ridiculously low pay, and unhealthy working conditions. All to increase profit.

Many American corporations base their operations outside of the US, even though they do most of their business, or sell their goods and services within the continental united states. They will set up shop in places like the Mariana Islands (a commonwealth in political union with the US) , and can actually put 'Made In USA' on products made there. Corporations will also often have multiple 'multi-national' companies that they have a controlling interest in that allow them to create tax shelters, hide debt, and create the illusion of growth or profit.

International banks have made it simpler for corporations to keep transactions off the books, and hide large amounts of money, as well as making it easier to continue their corruption. There have been attempts to try to regulate these banks, but all have met with failure. The insatiable greed, and complete lack of morals that the CEO's of these large corporate entities seem quite impossible to overcome.

Aside from the immediate effects on workers in foreign countries, they also face serious future problems in the form of air and water pollution. Since most of these underdeveloped countries do not have laws banning pollution, the corporations have yet another incentive to move their industrial facilities out of the US, and even after including the cost of shipping their goods, they can still make massive profits due to not having anyone monitoring the effects that production has on the environment.

US Corporations also take advantage of the instability of foreign countries, and will combine their own efforts, along with the US government in the form of lobbying, to make sure that the leaders of these countries do not stand in the way of their profits. This includes, but is not limited to: installing dictators who will allow the corporations to run unfettered, influencing the outcome of elections to make sure that the outcome works in their favor, and assasinating political figures who attempt to stand up to them.

The only solution that I see to curb these abuses by corporations would be to implement some form of regulation that takes all of these items into account. The first step would have to be the willingness of individuals within the US and other wealthy countries to forego their cheap shiny new toys and pay the real cost for things that they actually need. Since this isn't going to happen anytime soon, at least not voluntarily, it will need to be enforced. The current administration is too beholden to these corporations (especially oil) to be of any use in attempting to rectify the situation, and even after it is replaced, it is going to take hard work on the part of Americans, as well as those in other countries, both developed and not, to make a difference.

Next time: Freedom of the Press?

Tuesday, March 07, 2006

Building a Religion

"We are building a religion, we are buliding it bigger, we are widening the corridors and adding more lanes..."

--Cake, "Building a Religion" from the album "Comfort Eagle"



In my previous posts, I have repeatedly railed against the evils of organized religion, specifically Christianity. While I despise all organized religions equally, it should not be inferred that I despise all followers of these religions. I have met people who are able to leave room in their belief systems for alternate explanations, and this is all I would ever ask of someone. If someone wants to believe in Jesus, Allah, Vishnu, or Krishna, then more power to them, as long as they aren't hurting anyone else, or trying to force feed it to me. Of course, if they have children, or are in positions of power, and are feeding questionable information to those around them, then in my opinion, they are hurting people. Teaching a child to believe in God or Jesus, for example, isn't bad--only when you use fear tactics to keep them from questioning it.

It is mind boggling to me to consider the sheer numbers of people, who live seemingly totally normal lives, and yet prescribe to what I consider to be totally ridiculous belief systems. They will use technology that would not exist without science, and then turn around and claim that science is useless, and that only what they have faith in is real. I believe that you can have faith, without it blocking out the rest of reality. Some people can compartmentalize their beliefs, so they can have it both ways--believing in a 'God' without eliminating their ability to question. Realization that organized religions are self-propagating entities, and questioning the 'truth' contained within them, is detrimental to their continued existence. Regardless of their claims to exist in the best interests of mankind, it is obvious that they have a massive amount of power, large amounts of wealth, and are not afraid to exercise influence or control over those around them.

The hypocrisy of some people is almost unbelievable, as they take their views on something like having an abortion, which almost noone would ever 'want' to have, and force them on everyone. Their claims to 'moral' superiority are brought seriously into question when they support bombing abortion clinics, advocate killing abortion doctors, and especially forcing a woman who is raped or a girl who is molested to give birth to that child. Over the last decade or so, the religious right in America has been able to insert these 'moral' issues into political debate, attempting to take the high ground, although there are repeated cases of the biggest champions of the cause being guilty of moral quandaries.

Personally, if asked what I believe, I leave room for the possibility of a 'God', or a 'creator'. I can even understand where the 'Intelligent Design' argument originates. Anyone who sees the complexity and extents of the universe would be foolish not to at least consider the possibility. Anyone who has seen their own child brought into the world, and watched them grow cannot deny that it is nothing short of miraculous. However, it does 'God' a disservice to try to put him (or her, or it) into a box, and impose limitations (even if you still claim to believe that he is all-powerful). From what I see, religions, and their followers, take some of the best and worst attributes of humanity and attempt to imprint them upon their concept of God. They will use circular reasoning to 'prove' that there is evidence to back up their claims, quoting out of their own literature (often inaccurately). To me, a belief (or lack of belief) in God is a very personal thing, which I try to respect, unless confronted directly with what I consider to be false, misleading, or blatantly incorrect information. Arguing with someone who bases their beliefs on faith, as I have said before, is a losing battle since they usually do not leave room for the possibility that they might be wrong.

Despite how hard it is to admit to being wrong, I try to leave room for considering it. I have definitely been wrong about some things in the past, might very well be wrong about some things right now, and will doubtless be wrong about some things in the future. It is a constant source of amazement as to how many things that were obviously wrong were impossible to see when they were right in front of me. Sometimes all it takes is to listen to other points of view, or to perform research--even after you believe you have found the correct answer. Questioning what you believe to be true can sometimes be disheartening, sometimes reinforcing, but it can almost always lead to a better understanding of it. If only more people would consider the validity of their beliefs, especially based on their previous errors, it would lead to a much more enlightened world.

Next Time: The Global Economy